Teaching Commons event brings new light to assessment options

Teaching FEATURED

By Elaine Smith

A recent Teaching Commons event titled “Why Does Assessment Matter Anyway?” brought together 40 York faculty members and staff this summer to discuss assessment and take the opportunity to view it differently.

Geneviève Maheux-Pelletier
Geneviève Maheux-Pelletier

“We wanted to consider alternative assessment methods that view it as a tool for learning and a way to help students demonstrate understanding that is more real world,” said Geneviève Maheux-Pelletier, director of the Teaching Commons (TC) at York University. “In addition to the usual final exam or essay, there are methods that are more flexible so that students can more easily navigate what they need to do to be successful in a course, approaches such as flexible deadlines.”

The TC staff introduced a series of video interviews with faculty focused on assessment topics and other online resources – short videos and webinars – topics such as assessment design and a toolkit for undertaking an open-book exam. Valerie Florentin, for example, who teaches in the School of Translation at Glendon College, discussed her use of ungrading, a technique of self-evaluation with reference points. Florentin has a frank discussion with the students about what she is trying to measure when assessing their performance and assigning a grade. Then, she provides criteria and offers some coaching as they assign themselves a fair grade. It is a method she has tried both at Glendon and at the Université Laval, and she will do so again this fall to be able to compare and contrast the outcomes.

Merv Mosher, a long-serving, teaching stream faculty member in the School of Kinesiology and Health Sciences in the Faculty of Health, took a combined mastery grading and specification approach toward evaluating students in his large lecture/lab courses. Mosher said he was tiring of having students worrying endlessly about their grades and was frustrated that they were more concerned about the grade than the course content.

“Teaching Commons convinced me that there are other ways to do things,” he added.

With mastery grading, he set an achievable bar for his students, but allowed them multiple attempts to reach it (i.e., master the information). For instance, each of the weekly quizzes he gave required an 80 per cent in order for the mark to count; they had two additional tries for each quiz.

“The mastery approach is telling students, ‘I’m not interested in average work,’” he said. “I wanted the students to stay current with the material and I wanted them to demonstrate an understanding of the material.”

He employed specification grading for labs, providing students with sample lab reports that demonstrated exactly what they needed to create and submit, removing the guesswork from the experience.

The TC session also included an opportunity for participants to discuss what mattered to them with regard to grading. The conversation touched on issues such as equity, grading at scale for larger groups; academic integrity when students have more freedom (e.g., online tests); and formative learning.

Will Gage
Will Gage

Maheux-Pelletier called the session “very engaging” and noted that educational developers are available for one-on-one consultations with faculty who wish to implement such practices. She also issued an invitation to faculty to join a community of practice called the Assessment Evolution Working Group that she co-chairs with Will Gage, associate vice-president, teaching and learning. It meets every six weeks or so and focuses on assessment, deep learning and thinking about knowledge in a deeper manner – perhaps moving toward a competency-based model.

“The last couple of years when we were teaching remotely triggered conversations about assessment and how it could be done differently,” she said. “A competency-based model may be a good way to address equity and inclusion, since students can be co-designers of assessment tasks and equity components can be built in.”

Gage agreed, noting that it was important to know about other methods of assessing learning.

“We tend to stick with exams because they are what we know,” he said. “If we know there are other methods that are just as good or better at demonstrating competence or mastery and they are more accessible to students, then that is useful information.”

Gage said that he would like to see two outcomes from further consideration of assessment:

  • All faculty members having the opportunity to learn more about non-traditional ways of doing assessment; and
  • Seeing York acknowledged for breaking new ground and making these methods part of the way faculty teach and help students succeed.

“Our working group has been talking about what courses could look like and what faculty members are doing that is flying under the radar,” he said. “I don’t expect everyone to do these things, but I want everyone to have the opportunity to learn about them, regardless of academic discipline.

“These different approaches to assessment have the potential to be a real game-changer for post-secondary education.”

To join the community of practice, contact Maheux-Pelletier by email at gmp@yorku.ca.

Teaching in Focus helps faculty to get back in the groove

the word teach spelled out in scrabble blocks

By Elaine Smith

Rest, Renew, Revitalize was the theme of the annual Teaching in Focus (TiF) conference at York, and the May 11 and 12 event began as it meant to proceed: by showing faculty members how to take a break and re-energize themselves.

Professor Harvey Skinner’s keynote address had faculty members out of their chairs, doing some Qi Gong deep breathing and some standing exercises that were a way of relaxing the mind and giving the body the energy it needed to focus on the day’s activities. The 10-minute regimen is something that Skinner, a professor of psychology and global health and the founding dean of the Faculty of Health, has done to begin his classes and the difference it made was palpable.

Professor Harvey Skinner
Harvey Skinner

“I believe in interactive experiential learning,” said Skinner as he led the exercises. “Nature never hurries us, yet we’re always trying to rush. We need to be concerned about our overall wellness. We need to be at ease, energized and focused for learning, yet we’re being bombarded by all kinds of news that leaves students feeling depressed about the future.”

He works actively to offer an antidote to these depressed feelings, partly through the energizing regimen, partly through creating connections among the students. In addition to the regimen, Skinner does a quick Zoom poll of his students to see how they are feeling each day and builds in time at the start of his classes for students to meet – virtually or in person – in pairs so they can get to know each other. During his classes, he incorporates learning circles for group work that counts for 30 per cent of a student’s grade and he also requires them to create a personal plan for their health and development, appropriate in a psychology course.

Skinner offered tips for colleagues who wanted inject renewal and revitalization into their own classes, including:

  • Begin with yourself – you can’t heal others unless you have a way of rejuvenating yourself.
  • Break your online presentations into chunks of no more than 10 minutes and every 30 minutes, make time to stretch and stand.
  • Listen to your students; take the pulse of what they are thinking a feeling and make adjustments.
  • Take risks; step out of your comfort zone and be inspirational.

Skinner’s keynote kicked off a conference that was held virtually this year, organized by the Teaching Commons (TC) under the aegis of Professor Will Gage, associate vice-president, teaching and learning, who jokingly introduced the speaker as “my much older brother.”

Will Gage
Will Gage

Gage also welcomed the attendees, saying, “This conference is a wonderful opportunity to discuss innovations in teaching and learning at York University and elsewhere, including many of the lessons we’ve learned during the pandemic. It’s an excellent chance for us to share our stories, celebrate new ideas and look back at a challenging time.”

The virtual format allowed the TC to open the conference to others outside York University, and the event drew 114 attendees over the two days, 15 of them from other institutions such as Kings College London (U.K.), Carleton University in Ottawa and Bow Valley College in Alberta. Attendees could choose from among numerous concurrent sessions over the two-day period.

A number of sessions focused on restorative practices used in the classroom, including a talk by Jessica Vorstermans, an assistant professor of critical disability studies, titled “Centering Care and Access in a Large Undergraduate Course.” Vorstermans discussed the importance of building trust with the students, noting, “You can’t build access from a policing mindset.” Her suggestions for making the course more accessible to students included offering deadline flexibility by offering a seven-day extension automatically upon request, no questions asked; giving feedback in advance of a major assignment by reviewing the students’ outlines; and offering assessment in multiple formats so the students could choose something that suited their skills: infographics, podcasts, videos, etc.

Professor Jessica Vorstermans
Jessica Vorstermans

“You need to build classrooms that are sites of liberation, not control,” said Vorstermans.

Teaching in a Time of Exhaustion was another topic addressed by a variety of faculty members. For example, Ken McBey, a professor of human resources, gave a talk titled, “Team Teaching in Synchronous Online Courses,” a presentation he created with his colleague, Professor Len Karakowsky. Having taught online for years, the pair have discovered keys to team teaching success, including: compatibility among team members; a shared commitment to course success; support from the institution/Faculty; and a desire to ignite the students’ thirst for knowledge.

The third recurring topic was called Welcome to My Classroom, detailing a success approach used by a faculty member. Noah Lemish, an assistant professor of music, told attendees how he worked remotely with a virtual jazz ensemble, “radically reimagining” the course to involve the students in the production aspect of musical performance. The five members of the ensemble learned to record online and produce a combined sound using layered recording and tracking, techniques that have been used in the recording industry for decades. In addition to developing those skills, Lemish found other unexpected outcomes, such as growth in the students’ abilities to focus on details, listen critically and cultivate musicianship. He was so pleased that he plans to incorporate production into the course even when it is taught in person.

Susan Dion
Susan Dion

On the second day of the conference, attendees were invited to visit Kumospace, a virtual cafeteria, to expose themselves to new technology. Afterward, Faculty of Education Professor Susan Dion, associate vice-president, Indigenous initiatives, and her PhD students offered a closing keynote address that shared insights into the need for teaching spaces that are informal and adaptable and discussed ways to make spaces better for collaboration.

Geneviève Maheux-Pelletier, director of the Teaching Commons, said that, as always, participants came away inspired by the creativity and dedication of their colleagues and the ideas about reframing the teaching-learning relationship.

“The intent is to have participants leave TiF thinking about what they have learned that they can adapt to their own classrooms to make them inviting places that are so important to allow for conversations to happen,” said Maheux-Pelletier.

“This has been my favourite TiF conference ever,” she added. “The student focus brought a different tone to the event that was compassionate and heartwarming.”

Success of hyflex pilot is a collaborative effort

An image of a women using a laptop to video conference with another woman

Beginning in the Fall 2022 term, faculty members will be able to code their courses with “HYFX” to indicate hyflex mode, meaning that students can take the course either in person or remotely – or both, depending on the day’s demands on their schedules.

By Elaine Smith

The new remote or in-person option for students is the result of a pilot project in hyflex course delivery conducted during the 2021-22 academic year. Several York University faculty members taught their courses in classrooms that were newly equipped with varying levels of technology to allow students to learn either in person or remotely. The pilot offered an avenue for determining what this hybrid hyflex method of teaching might permit for both faculty and students.

Now, faculty members who are interested in teaching hyflex courses can request access to one of the classrooms equipped with the appropriate technology and students will be able to deliberately register for this option.

“Our hope is for students in hyflex courses to have an equitable experience whether they are learning in class or remotely,” said Peter Wolf, the educational advisor who has worked with Will Gage, York University’s associate vice-president of teaching and learning, to bring hyflex classes to York.

Making hyflex a reality didn’t happen overnight and has required collaboration among a number of groups, including the Office of the Associate Vice-President Teaching and Learning, Wolf, the Teaching Commons, University Information Technology, Learning Technology Services and the Office of the University Registrar.

Yelin Su, an educational developer with the Teaching Commons, became involved in hyflex learning when the pilot project got underway.

Yelin Su
Yelin Su

Su supported the pilot from a pedagogical angle, assisting faculty with best practices for hyflex teaching and consulting with them individually if they had questions about improving the course design to be more effective in a hyflex situation. There is also a newsletter for pilot project participants, the Hyflex Times, which provides background on the initiative, theory and new information about best practices – a joint effort by the Teaching Commons, Learning Technology Services and Wolf.

“Hyflex is trendy across North America, so we can learn from each other,” notes Su.

Robert Winkler, an instructional designer, began working with Wolf prior to the pilot’s launch to develop a tool to help faculty determine if hyflex teaching would be a good fit for their courses.

“It’s a brand new format, but it isn’t distinct from other teaching initiatives,” Winkler explains. “It’s pedagogy meeting technology and it’s illustrative of our Teaching Commons mission of combining leading technology with leading pedagogical practice, making them user friendly for all faculty and inviting everyone to try it.”

Robert Winkler
Robert Winkler

Su and Winkler also created a workshop series to introduce interested faculty to hyflex teaching and discuss different ways of doing it.

“We looked at theories and successes elsewhere, since there is a wide range of implementation,” says Winkler, “but in our pilot phase, we have tried to find out what will work here at York. Often, when we talk about implementing a new pedagogical procedure, we focus on what’s normative, but norms aren’t present yet. We are constructing the model.”

Now that hyflex is a teaching option, Su and Winkler are eager to learn from their colleagues’ real-world experience and help them solve any problems that arise.

“We’ll try to come to you with a fusion of pedagogy and technology to make your life easier,” says Winkler.

At UIT, Aladin Alaily, director of client support services together with his audio-visual team, have been busy equipping classrooms so hyflex teaching is possible, working with vendors and installing and testing the equipment. His classroom operations team has been leading demonstrations for faculty members who want to teach in one of the appropriate classrooms. There is also an instructional website.

There are currently three styles of classroom that accommodate some version of hyflex teaching: small seminar rooms that have a sound bar, a speaker, a microphone and a camera; standard rooms with a camera at the rear to physically track the faculty member and relay the images automatically while a ceiling microphone picks up student questions, as well as two screens at the podium, a wireless microphone for the teacher and a sound system; and, finally, a standard-plus room that adds two large reference monitors that make it unnecessary for the teacher to turn their back on the class.

A hyflex classroom at the Keele Campus
A hyflex classroom at the Keele Campus

“It’s a very exciting project and it becomes the footprint for standard rooms, so we’ll put that equipment into future builds so faculty can leverage the technology in any class,” says Alaily. “Hyflex and the need to teach remotely came fairly quickly, but we rose to the occasion and delivered what needed to be done.

“We have a standard set of equipment that we install for a hyflex classroom, but based on feedback, the pilot project and interactions during demonstrations, we’ll adapt to faculty needs.”

Alaily notes that hyflex gives students flexibility and options.

“We always had the ability to record lectures and transmit them through eClass, but now the technology allows for real-time broadcasts so students can choose to attend in person or remotely; it’s their choice.”

Frankie Billingsley, associate registrar and director, student records and scheduling, oversaw the unit that created the new course code for hyflex courses.

“Professors will have the opportunity to assign the HYFX code to any of their courses and we’re making sure on the back end that it is allowed only if the courses are taught in the specified hyflex rooms,” says Billingsley. “We want to avoid assigning the hyflex course code if it’s taught in a classroom without the proper technology. Our structure will allow, however, a professor who teaches in a hyflex-enabled classroom, to choose not to use the technology and, therefore, not to utilize the hyflex course code as a delivery method.”

This summer, Wolf will be evaluating the results of the pilot project to see what insights can be gleaned for the future.

Wolf and Gage are keenly interested in giving hyflex every chance for success.

“York is among the early adopters of this emerging delivery mode and we hope to learn more about it in a rigorous and scholarly way,” says Gage. “The pilot was set up so we could collect data and evidence in order to build expertise collaboratively and constructively. Over time, we hope to create the context wherein students in the classroom and students attending virtually can ‘feel’ like they’re together and can easily collaborate regardless of their location of learning.”

Nomination deadline approaching for President’s University-Wide Teaching Awards

image shows a class in the Curtis Lecture hall

The President’s University-Wide Teaching Awards honour those who, through innovation and commitment, have significantly enhanced the quality of learning for York students. The nomination deadline is Jan. 28.

Four awards are offered each year in the following categories:

  • Full-time tenured faculty with 10 or more years of full-time teaching experience
  • Full-time faculty (tenured/tenure-stream/CLA) with less than 10 years of teaching experience
  • Contract and adjunct faculty
  • Teaching assistants

The purpose of these awards is to provide significant recognition for excellence in teaching, to encourage its pursuit, to publicize such excellence when achieved across the University and in the wider community, and to promote informed discussion of teaching and its improvement. The awards demonstrate the value York University attaches to teaching. Recipients of the awards, selected by the Senate Committee on Awards, receive $3,000 less applicable deductions, have their names engraved on the University-Wide Teaching Award plaques in Vari Hall and are recognized at convocation ceremonies.

Nominators are encouraged to approach the Teaching Commons to explore ways to best highlight the teaching strengths and accomplishments of the nominee. Nominators may schedule a consultation – by phone or Zoom – with an educational developer at the Teaching Commons to discuss the preparation of a nomination package by sending a request to teaching@yorku.ca.   

Only online nominations for the 2022 Teaching Awards, submitted by 4:30 p.m. on Jan. 28, will be accepted.

The President’s University-Wide Teaching Awards criteria and nomination form are available on the Senate Committee on Awards webpage.

New role focuses on pedagogical innovation in science education

Life sciences lab showing students working on projects featured image for January Innovatus

Biology Professor Tamara Kelly has been appointed the Faculty of Science’s inaugural Pedagogical Innovation Chair in Science Education. She outlines her four main goals as she focuses on the future.

By Elaine Smith 

Tamara Kelly
Tamara Kelly

Professor Tamara Kelly, the Faculty of Science’s inaugural Pedagogical Innovation Chair in Science Education, is enthusiastic about her three-year appointment, which began in Sept. 2021. 

Kelly, a biology professor who joined York University in 2008, is a co-founder and past president of the Open Consortium of Undergraduate Biology Educators, a national organization to promote knowledge mobilization in undergraduate biology education, and previously was a postdoctoral Science Teaching and Learning Fellow for the Carl Wieman Science Education Initiative at the University of British Columbia.  

As she shapes the role of Pedagogical Innovation Chair in Science Education, Kelly has four main goals that work together. First, she would like to create a Faculty of Science teaching and learning community of practice to share the knowledge of inclusive teaching practices among faculty at all levels and teaching assistants. She would also like to develop a Research in Science Education subgroup to support and increase scholarship of teaching and learning activities (SoTL) within the Faculty.

“I want to create a community that will empower all instructors to teach using evidence-based and inclusive strategies and provide students with exceptional learning opportunities and improved experiences and satisfaction,” Kelly said.

She shares her experience in academia has shown her that such a community “underpins the pedagogical experience and helps you to tweak what you’re doing, collect metrics and introduce new approaches. I want evidence-based principles to be the basis for our decisions, not history.” 

Second, Kelly will work to create support, professional development and training for graduate students so they can perform well in the classroom and derive satisfaction from that aspect of their roles. 

“We want them to be adequately prepared,” Kelly said. She acknowledges the excellent teaching assistant (TA) training that the Teaching Commons offers, but notes, “we can’t leave it all to the Teaching Commons, because they have other responsibilities, too. Ultimately, I’d like this to be embedded into our graduate program.”  

Giving faculty members opportunities to expand their teaching repertoire is also important. 

“Good teaching is a skill to be developed, so we need to give people space to continue learning,” she said. “What we know about teaching and learning is changing. We want to provide people with these skills and the opportunity to practise.”  

Kelly’s third goal is to embed inclusive, anti-racist, decolonizing science education courses within the curriculum. 

While Kelly has experience using inclusive teaching practices within her courses, “I am an absolute beginner here; I’m at the starting line when it comes to Indigenization, but we have a responsibility to the Truth & Reconciliation Commission’s Calls to Action.” 

In addition to ensuring science is accessible and inclusive, Kelly would like to see more attention being paid to retention. 

“We don’t want to be a bank that forgets its loyal customers,” she said. “We want to support students in achieving their goals. We still have standards, but we need to support students in reaching them.” 

Finally, Kelly would like to see more focus on what faculty members are doing within the classroom, finding ways to measure their success and define a standard of excellence. This includes giving excellent work more visibility by using the Faculty’s website and social media accounts. 

“I want our students to see a lot of the great work faculty members are doing and have it acknowledged,” Kelly said. “I want us to promote teaching excellence; it’s not enough to pay lip service to it.” 

She praises Ashley Nahornick, the Faculty of Science educational development specialist, for her “incredible support” as Kelly works to realize these goals. 

Kelly knows that many people will be uneasy about these changes, worrying about disruption to the status quo, “but I’m here to help those people,” she said. “I see this position as supporting others as we try to change things together. I want this to be a group effort; ideas and actions are much better that way. Collaboration is so important.”

Nomination deadline approaching for President’s University-Wide Teaching Awards

image shows a class in the Curtis Lecture hall

The President’s University-Wide Teaching Awards honour those who, through innovation and commitment, have significantly enhanced the quality of learning for York students. The nomination deadline is Jan. 28.

Four awards are offered each year in the following categories:

  • Full-time tenured faculty with 10 or more years of full-time teaching experience
  • Full-time faculty (tenured/tenure-stream/CLA) with less than 10 years of teaching experience
  • Contract and adjunct faculty
  • Teaching assistants

The purpose of these awards is to provide significant recognition for excellence in teaching, to encourage its pursuit, to publicize such excellence when achieved across the University and in the wider community, and to promote informed discussion of teaching and its improvement. The awards demonstrate the value York University attaches to teaching. Recipients of the awards, selected by the Senate Committee on Awards, receive $3,000 less applicable deductions, have their names engraved on the University-Wide Teaching Award plaques in Vari Hall and are recognized at convocation ceremonies.

Nominators are encouraged to approach the Teaching Commons to explore ways to best highlight the teaching strengths and accomplishments of the nominee. Nominators may schedule a consultation – by phone or Zoom – with an educational developer at the Teaching Commons to discuss the preparation of a nomination package by sending a request to teaching@yorku.ca.   

Only online nominations for the 2022 Teaching Awards, submitted by 4:30 p.m. on Jan. 28, will be accepted.

The President’s University-Wide Teaching Awards criteria and nomination form are available on the Senate Committee on Awards webpage.

Call for nominations: President’s University-Wide Teaching Awards

image shows a class in the Curtis Lecture hall

The President’s University-Wide Teaching Awards honour those who, through innovation and commitment, have significantly enhanced the quality of learning by York students.

Four awards are offered each year in the following categories:

  • Full-Time tenured faculty with 10 or more years of full-time teaching experience
  • Full-Time faculty (tenured/tenure-stream/CLA) with less than 10 years of teaching experience
  • Contract and adjunct faculty
  • Teaching assistants

The purpose of these awards is to provide significant recognition for excellence in teaching, to encourage its pursuit, to publicize such excellence when achieved across the University and in the wider community, and to promote informed discussion of teaching and its improvement.

The awards demonstrate the value York University attaches to teaching. Recipients of the awards, selected by the Senate Committee on Awards, receive $3,000 less applicable deductions, have their names engraved on the University-Wide Teaching Award plaques in Vari Hall and are recognized at convocation ceremonies.

Nominators are encouraged to approach the Teaching Commons to explore ways to best highlight the teaching strengths and accomplishments of the nominee. Nominators can schedule a consultation – by phone or Zoom – with an educational developer at the Teaching Commons to discuss the preparation of a nomination package by sending a request to teaching@yorku.ca.

Only online nominations for the 2022 Teaching Awards, submitted by 4:30 p.m. on Jan. 28, 2022, will be accepted.

The Teaching Awards criteria and nomination form are available on the Senate Committee on Awards webpage.

York University’s Teaching Commons is always evolving

Image shows fall trees in brilliant reds and golds. The trees line the campus walk on the Keele campus.

Instructional needs of faculty, course directors and teaching assistants at York University are constantly changing and the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic has brought this into sharp focus. The University’s Teaching Commons has responded by rethinking and expanding their support, workshops and courses.

By Elaine Smith, special contributor

Geneviève Maheux-Pelletier
Geneviève Maheux-Pelletier

As the instructional needs of faculty, course directors and teaching assistants at York University change, the staff at the Teaching Commons adjust the workshops and services they provide accordingly.

“With the pandemic, we’ve had to really expand and extend the kinds of offerings we’ve traditionally had at the Teaching Commons,” said Geneviève Maheux-Pelletier, the Teaching Commons’ director. “Beyond merely pivoting to online delivery of services, we’ve had to rethink and expand our support.”

As course delivery moved online, the Teaching Commons staff attempted to “meet the instructors wherever they were,” said Maheux-Pelletier, whether that meant providing an introduction to using Zoom or answering questions about engaging students remotely. The Going Remote website had more than 30,000 page views from September 2020 to August 2021.

One thing that remained constant was access to the Teaching Commons’ educational developers.

“We continued our virtual office hours from 10 a.m. to noon so people could come with questions and we could provide just-in-time support,” she said.

In addition, the Teaching Commons has continued to offer its popular certificate courses, workshops and seminars. Courses are generally asynchronous and allow faculty, course directors and teaching assistants to use the eClass environment to work at their own pace. They can be taken individually or bundled into a certificate such as the Certificate of Proficiency for Teaching in eLearning. Two new courses were added to the certificate’s lineup this this summer: Beyond eClass: Interactive Pedagogies Using Zoom, H5P and More; and Caring to Teach: Supporting Student Transitions Between Teaching and Learning Environments.

“One of the positives coming out of the pandemic has been an interest in compassionate teaching and a heightened sense of the difficulties and hardships students experience and what it might mean to care for them in an online environment.”

Educational developer Natasha May co-created Caring to Teach, a four-module course that focuses on the pedagogy of care.

“This course was inspired by our postdoctoral visitors, Brandon Wooldridge and Ameera Ali, who were very eager, so it got things moving,” said May. “We met weekly during the winter to brainstorm ideas and also discussed it during our team meetings.

“The course connects Brandon’s research into the pedagogy of care from an instructor’s perspective and Ameera’s research into transitioning between learning environments with student well-being as the focus.”

May said that the first module explores what it means to incorporate a pedagogy of care into your courses, while the second looks at transitioning to remote learning and back and its impact on students. The next two modules focus on flexibility and what faculty can do to disaster-proof their courses, making the transition easier. The final module focuses on the faculty member’s own professional development and next steps.

Participants were able to take the course synchronously or asynchronously, with opportunities for weekly synchronous discussions and breakout rooms. There were 27 participants in the program, 21 of whom completed all the modules.

“I got all kinds of great ideas from the class and I hope we provided them with some support,” said May.

Additionally, the Teaching Commons also added the Active Learning Playground to its portfolio this summer. Educational developer Robin Sutherland-Harris led the development of the playground, comprising five one-and-a-half-hour sessions.

“It’s an idea that came up during a workshop series, said Sutherland-Harris. “Everything has been so unsettled and it seemed unclear what the fall would look like, so we wanted to support a flexible approach to teaching to keep everyone active and engaged. One way of responding to the uncertainty was to prioritize a conversation about implementing active learning strategies in the classroom.”

Each playground session explored one or more active learning strategies that faculty could use in various contexts (e.g. blended, face-to-face, online) and the ways they could be adapted to whatever the pandemic required. The program had 82 participants this summer.

“We’d talk about the strategies, such as six thinking hats or escape rooms, and have people use them in the session,” said Sutherland-Harris. “Then, we’d discuss their experiences of each activity and what challenges they envisioned in incorporating it into their courses. It was a fun and exploratory way of engaging with the uncertainty around teaching.”

This fall, the Teaching Commons team will be back on campus five days a week and will use their courses to experiment with two new classrooms that are equipped for collaborative learning and hyflex delivery (enabling remote participants to join the in-person session using Zoom and cutting-edge hardware).

“We’ll see how faculty in those classes respond to these modes as learners,” said Maheux-Pelletier. “It will also give them the ability to understand the learner’s point of view.”

Depending on the pandemic landscape this fall, “we’ll be as flexible and as thorough as possible in delivering our programming and in documenting results so we can see where the interest is and look toward the winter semester.”